





|
|
Too many bugs, way too much time
By Brian Levinson
Bugs. Bugs drinking. Bugs eating. Bugs eating smaller bugs. Bugs
getting eaten by larger bugs. Bugs metamorphasizing from slimy wormy bugs into
fuzzy flying bugs. Bugs screwing. Bugs just kind of hanging around.
Read the previous paragraph, over and over for about an hour and fifteen
minutes, and you'll understand the entirety of the plot, dialogue, and action
in Microcosmos, the new film from Claude Nuridsany and Marie Perennou.
Aside from a theme song sung at the pitch of the Emergency Broadcast System and
a brief voice over from some pretentious British lady, there's nothing in this
movie but bugs. Even Bruno Coulais's interesting score is often obscured by
the insects' symphony of squirmy chattering.
It took Nuridsany and Perennou three years to make Microcosmos, and six
months to edit it. With specially-designed cameras, they ventured beneath the
tall weeds of a grassy French meadow, and went incredibly deep into the
personal lives of French insects. The world they discovered is an often
beautiful, yet usually harsh, jungle landscape. Blades of grass stretch upwards
like fairy-tale beanstalks, a pond becomes a vast ocean, and flowers have
cavernous, nectar-filled interior regions. The main characters of Disney's
Honey, I Shrunk The Kids would probably get killed here in about five
messy seconds.
As nasty and irritating as they can often be, the bugs themselves are revealed
to be incredibly complex creatures, pursuing daily tasks and rituals of which
humans have no conception. Caterpillars crawl, single file, to drink together
at a stream of water. Another insect emerges from, and then eats, its larval
sac. Mosquitoes dart effortlessly across a pond's surface, evading the
predation of frogs and salamanders. Each insect is revealed as an entirely
unique creature; a literal world of difference is exposed between the awkward
flight of a ladybug and the graceful one of a bumblebee. As the film goes on,
the audience begins to notice distinct differences between members of the same
species; different bees, it seems, have different personalities.
And the film does go on. And on. Microcosmos ads, depicting a praying
mantis in sunglasses, brag that the movie "is Jurassic Park in your own
backyard!" Do not let this fool you. First, at 75 minutes, the film is only as
long as a typical Yale biology lecture--and is often twice as dull. Second, the
insects mainly eat each other, not human actors; and although it's somewhat
interesting to watch a spider kill a grasshopper, neither this nor anything
else in the movie provides the viewer anything close to excitement. There's
only so much anyone can take of watching bugs doing bug things, many of them
disgusting, and Microcosmos really pushes this rather sketchy genre to
the limit. Nuridsany and Perennou try to present their world as one of infinite
wonder, but the sense of amazement the viewer feels at the beginning wears off
pretty damn quickly. By the film's end, I was hoping a kid with a magnifying
glass would come along and fry the whole "cast."
Despite Microcosmos' high boredom factor, the photography is undeniably
gorgeous. On such a small scale, some of the bugs--butterflies, the more
colorful caterpillars--are invested with beauty, and certain scenes (two ants
drinking from a dewdrop, a glistening carnivorous plant devouring a bee) are
striking and highly memorable. The movie's problem is this: most of the bugs
are repulsive, and most of the things they do are absolutely disgusting. When
you could chose seeing Luke kick the Dark Side's ass in Return of the Jedi,
is there anybody who really wants to see a dung beetle rolling an enormous
sheep turd up a pile of dirt? Or nasty close-ups of slimy bee larvae? Or two
snails, animals which are essentially giant boogers with shells, doing the
nasty (the ugliest love scene since Deliverance)?
I hope not.
Back to A & E...
|