Yale's finest deserve a fair contract
By Noel Poyo, Peter Stein, & Rob Stilling
As we hunker down to finish off the semester, an issue important to the Yale
community slips along unnoticed. For the past 21 months, Yale Police officers
have been working without a contract. In the past month, negotiations between
the Yale Police Benevolent Association (the union that represents Yale Police
officers) and the Yale Administration have come to a grinding halt. These
negotiations represent the YPBA's effort to bring its contract closer to those
of other police departments, such as New Haven's and Harvard's.
In recent years, the duties of Yale Police officers have grown. Our officers
are now deputized New Haven officers with jurisdiction over the entire city.
The NHPD routinely routes calls from areas around campus to Yale Police,
including murders and other violent crimes. The Yale Police have the right to
expect their contract to reflect the increasing responsibility and danger their
jobs entail. Understanding the changing role of Yale Police on campus and in
New Haven is vital to understanding their positions at the negotiating table.
Three issues separate Yale and the Association:
1. Pension. The first point of contention surrounds the age and years
of service required to retire with full pension benefits. Currently, YPD
officers can retire and collect a pension equal to half their pay after 33
years on the Yale force. New Haven Police can retire with the same benefits
after 20 years. Yale has offered 25 years, to which the union has agreed on two
conditions. First, the union wants to lower the age at which an officer can
retire and receive partial benefits from 55 to 50. Second, under the old
contract, the number of years an officer worked for Yale plus his or her age
must equal 70 in order to retire with some benefits. The YPBA wants to lower
this to 65.
Why these stipulations? Police work is physically demanding. The union wants
to maintain a younger, more effective force, but this change is impossible
under the current system. These changes will improve student security and will
help ensure the safety of the police. Yale estimates that each of these
stipulations will cost $85,000 per officer. The Administration arrives at this
figure by assuming that every officer on the force will take advantage of both
of these provisions (retire at 50 with exactly 15 years of service and thus
receive partial benefits). This is a ridiculous assumption that only serves to
inflate the figure. But even using the Administration's figure, this concession
to the 55-member union would barely constitute a footnote in Yale's
billion-dollar budget.
2. Disabilities. The Yale Police currently have the same disability
plan as professors and administrators. Officers put themselves in harm's way
for a living and therefore want to bring their coverage closer to what most
police officers have. The major point of disagreement is that the YPBA wants
the plan to cover any disability that prevents an officer from working. Yale
only wants to cover them for disabilities incurred "on the job," a vague term
that could lead to court battles. Yale would obviously have an advantage in
lawyers and money in such a situation.
As Yale skimps on disability, it is interesting to examine other protection
Yale fails to provide. Yale does not supply its officers with bulletproof
vests, but allows them to respond to calls throughout the city, including
murders. Officers are given a $500 per year allowance for uniforms. But even if
every cent of this is spent on a vest, it still takes close to three years to
save enough to buy one of these life-saving devices. Some officers pay out of
their own pockets for a vest. Others must wait--unprotected.
3. Officers' Bill of Rights. Finally, the Benevolent Association
asks for something that will cost Yale nothing--an Officers' Bill of Rights.
The officers want some definition of how they should be treated by their
supervisors and the Administration. This is an issue of respect and dignity,
not economics. The Union began with 150 proposals to bring its old contract out
of the dark ages. The Administration has taken each proposal separately,
negotiating very slowly. Meanwhile, Yale Police have worked without a contract.
This period included the Local 34/35 strikes, during which they worked 12-hour
shifts and six-day weeks. Such an arrangement showed good faith on the part of
the Union to make negotiations work, yet Yale plods along at a snail's pace.
Where does this leave us? Settling this matter as soon as possible suits the
best interests of all parties involved. A fair contract will allow for a
stronger, more effective police force that can provide the highest quality
protection. The Yale Police Benevolent Association asks only for a contract
that recognizes the important role its members play in keeping Yale safe.
Noel Poyo is a senior in Morse, Peter Stein is a junior in Davenport, and
Rob Stilling is a junior in Morse
Respond in Speak Your Mind!
Back to Opinion...
|