The gift of life from Yale
The Kitchen Sink
By Karen Abravanel
We all know that our Ivy League education will make us highly employable when we go into the labor market. According to
three recent ads in the Yale Daily News classified section, half
of us also have a similar edge in the market for going into labor. Nestled
among pitches for cheap vacation rates and blurbs about apartment rentals,
infertile couples seek the legacy of a Yale degree. "Help our dream come true,"
pleads the latest in a trio of ads. "Ivy League alumna needs egg donor."
Before these three ads appeared and offered a higher rate of compensation than
the best of my summer job options, I had not thought about the business of egg
donation. The first ad, in which a "Professional couple" solicits "easy egg
donation or surrogacy," caught my attention in January, while I was doing the
crossword. Repulsed but curious when the ads multiplied, I decided to do some
research.
Internet websites such as www.eggdonor.com are evidence of an industry that thrives on the most reprehensible methods of genetic engineering. Located at the above address, for example, the Center for Surrogate Parenting and Egg Donation provides access to a "unique" Internet database of over 300 donor
profiles. The database, which also contains color photos, allows prospective
egg recipients to "select specific criteria such as eye color, educational
background, and ethnic origin." Exhibiting especially poor word choice, the
Center tells these prospective recipients that it "look[s] forward to helping
you create your family."
 |
| BEGUM BENGU/YH | Another YDN ad demonstrates a more temperate version of the Internet
database, presenting a "loving infertile couple" in search of a "special egg
donor." In addition to being "a compassionate woman," this couple hopes that
their donor will have "blond or brown hair and blue eyes."
Perhaps these features describe the prospective mother and father themselves,
and their search for a woman with these features illustrates their wish for
their child to resemble them. Prevented from natural conception, these couples
want their child to be as much their own as possible. This desire probably
explains their initial attraction to egg donation, and I sympathize. But
whether the husband and wife of the "loving infertile couple" want their child
to be more their own, or whether they actually want an "Aryan baby," they have
chosen to "select specific criteria."
In addition to physical attributes, the most important of these specific
criteria is intellect. "We would be delighted to find a healthy, intelligent
college student or graduate student," the "loving infertile couple" writes.
Enter Yale.
This appeal to Yalies gives the couple an easy way to gauge a potential
donor's intelligence, using enrollment in a particular school as an absolute
measure of intellectual ability. The "Ivy League alumna," by describing herself
as such, appeals to the sense of elite camaraderie that comes from attending an
institution such as Yale. She searches for a donor who has had experiences
similar to her own.
Saying these couples "just want to know what they're getting," however, is an
understatement. According to the website for the Los Angeles-based Egg Donor
Program, potential donors face an application process which rivals that of a
top university. After a series of medical tests and genetic background checks,
a prospective donor must present "a measure of her intelligence determined by
an IQ test, SAT scores and/or GPA and educational background." The program
also promises couples "a real sense of the donor's personality through a series
of short essays in which she describes herself and her motivations," stating
that "donors are also chosen on a basis of their motivations to help."
Advertising in the YDN, then, represents the couples' assumption that
Yale students already possess such intellectual qualities. Each ad includes a
toll-free phone number, so I expect that all three appear in other
newspapers--but probably only at universities whose students have been deemed
sufficiently intelligent by the ads' sponsors.
On the flip side, the couples assume that their status as "Ivy League alumni"
or "Professionals" will make them more attractive to a potential donor. Just as
they view "Yale student" to mean "qualified donor," these couples hope that
donors will view "Ivy League" and "Professional" as synonyms for "qualified
parents," and will feel more comfortable with egg donation and its
responsibilities.
Attempting to appeal to the donor's sense of educational camaraderie as well
as her presumed desire for her progeny to have a good home, the "loving
infertile couple" actually seems to be the same couple who placed the "Ivy
League alumna" ad. Both ads list the same phone number. If one appeal proves
fruitless, maybe the other will be successful.
Such appeals augment the offers of monetary compensation--and some of Yale's
finer male students lament the substantial nature of these offers. "Why do
chicks get paid so much more than we do?" I overheard someone say in the
Davenport dining hall. Our Yale education makes us more marketable, but
employers and prospective egg recipients beware: we are intellectually
diverse.
Recent Herald Columns by this Columnist:
NOTE: SITE WILL APPEAR IN A NEW BROWSER WINDOW
Back to Opinion...
|