|
|
YCC elections come and go--but do Yalies care?
By Lauren Patrick
Tireless person-to-person campaigning. Massive distribution of flyers,
posters, and table tents. Endorsements from ethnic groups, political
organizations, and varsity athletic teams. Without a doubt, many campus
organizations, and certainly the candidates themselves, are very involved in
the Yale College Council (YCC) elections--but what about the student body?
 |
| PATRICK MCGARVEY/YH |
| Although YCC candidates are plastering the campus with campaign posters, questions about who is noticing them persist. |
|
The two-week campaigning period is a crucial and grueling time for the
candidates. YCC President Kimberly Taylor, TC '99, who had a staff to
orchestrate her campaign, described it as "a personally strenuous process in
which you present yourself and your ideas to the campus at one of the busiest
times of the year."
Indeed, despite the increased workload towards the end of the year for most
Yalies, current and past candidates said they routinely forego classes for the
benefit of their campaigns. Former YCC President, Tyson Belanger, ES '98, took
two weeks off from classes and went to each dorm room on Old Campus to
distribute bookmarks--twice. "It's just not easy to reach out to people and
show them how much you care," Belanger said. YCC Vice President Charles Rink,
TC '98, reported that students were generally polite and receptive to his
flyers and posters.
But the question of how students feel about the YCC has an ambiguous answer at
best. Although statistics show that the student turnout rate in the YCC
elections hovers around only 50 percent, Taylor described a student body
interested in the issues and eager to vote. Concern about the issues in the
election, she said, "is important because many issues and ideas have come to
affect Yale even if the candidates themselves did not win."
A number of people, however, were more skeptical of the supposed student
interest. "Most students are apathetic," UOFC Chair Josh Naftalis, TC '99,
said. "They are not happy with the YCC unless they get something out of it."
Former YCC Vice President Preston Hopson, SM '98, agreed that generating
student interest is a frustrating task. "We tried to be an activist
organization concerned with student issues, and have even invited people to
come and participate in the meetings," he said. "If YCC were to disappear,
people would realize how much it did for them." YCC members point to the
lukewarm reception of the recently announ-ced cable-TV package as evidence of
the student body's indifference.
But according to some students, the problem isn't apathy, it's a lack of voice
in the decision-making process. "The only time I feel involved is during the
elections," Ming Zhou, SM '00, said. "But after the candidates are elected I
don't feel involved at all." Spring Fling, perhaps the most visible of the
YCC's endeavors, has drawn the same type of criticism from students. "[Spring
Fling] seemed to be just an arbitrary decision made behind closed doors. Yalies
aren't really involved," Rasheena Harris, MC '99, said.
As a result of this distance, many students admitted that they don't recognize
any of the candidates come election time, and often have little interest in
voting unless their friends are on the ballot. Jennifer Emerson, BK '98, said
that she will be voting for the first time this year because it is the first
time she knows a candidate personally--and he's supposedly running as a joke.
Harris said that when she receives an e-mail from a candidate she simply skims
it and looks for a name to remember.
According to YCC candidates, new election regulations that limit the number of
posters and flyers that a candidate is allowed to post force campaigning to
become far more interactive. But even though candidates find themselves going
door-to-door, according to Naftalis, one of the most important elements in
winning a seat on the YCC is "getting your friends and their friends to vote
for you."
Back to News...
|