YCC presidential candidates uniform
By Henry Wong
When I looked at the list of presidential candidates for
the Yale College Council (YCC), I realized that six white males--and
only six white males--were vying for this prestigious position. Does
anybody else see anything wrong with that?
My roommate suggested that minority students have no right to complain just
because they're minority students. If they aren't running for office
themselves, he argued, what right do they have to talk about it?
I thought about this for some time, wondering why I was concerned about
something so meaningless as the YCC. Who cares? After all, candidates like
Chris Barnard, JE '99, are using the overall lack of respect for the YCC as the
focus of their campaigns.
One major reason we should care is that the student government is
supposed to represent the student body. More accurately, the YCC should
represent the voters. That gives us the right to talk about candidates, their
positions, and their legitimacy.
That only white males are running for the top position in our student
government brings up a set of issues more important than dining hall surveys,
Spring Fling, and card-operated laundry machines.
One would think that minorities and women would jump into student government,
an area where Yalies can rise to positions of influence without any experience.
We often hear minority communities complaining vociferously about how there are
so few minorities in top positions in government, business, and academia. And
we often hear women crying out about the sexism that bars them from top
leadership positions in America.
So why didn't one minority or female decide to run for president? It is true
that there is a good number of women and minorities running this year--but for
every position except the most prominent. Don't any of these candidates want to
hold the top leadership position instead of working in the background? This
year's YCC president, Kimbie Taylor, TC '99, is female--why is this such an
exception?
I'd like to think that the most logical explanation for this is that many of
the qualified minority and female students are using their leadership and
organizational skills in other areas, such as in minority student organizations
and the Women's Center, and do not have time to lead two groups.
But that explanation may not be satisfactory. Surely there are enough
strong-willed minority and female students who want a piece of the YCC glory.
The "lack of available leaders" argument doesn't work for women, especially
since Yale is half female. The argument that some racist and sexist power
structure prevents candidates from running for president is too extreme,
considering that the position is fully open to all interested Yalies.
Maybe students feel they cannot bring change from the inside, and they have to
confront the system from the oustide.
If so, I think the fault lies with minority and female students who don't wish
to participate in the activities of the general student body. Instead of trying
to portray themselves as minorities and/or women first, or alienating the rest
of Yale with offensive campaigns like the "Whiteout" protest in an attempt to
spark meaningful discussion, they should try to make people remember that we
are, first and foremost, Yalies. Having a diverse list of candidates for YCC
president would be a good start.
Henry Wong is a freshman in Davenport.
Back to Opinion...
|