|
|
Humanists offer an alternative for agnostics
By Chris Mooney
On Tues., Apr. 7, the Yale Political Union (YPU) debated
the topic, "Resolved: Religious Morality Should Guide Political Decisions."
Keynoting the debate were two Christians, Reverend Richard Neuhaus and Yale Law
Professor Stephen Carter. Not surprisingly, both defended the resolution.
Of the two, Neuhaus was more provocative. He insulted homosexuals and
suggested that scientists agree unanimously that abortion is murder. He argued
that the United States has been "a Christian nation" from its inception, and
expressed concern about the "judicial usurpation of politics" we have seen in
the last decades.
Most helpful, however, was Neuhaus's unique redefinition of the word
"religion" to include atheists and agnostics. "Devout" non-theists, he
explained, simply have not "reflected" enough to realize that they too are
"religious" individuals. Oh, one more thing: according to Neuhaus, we are
all sinners.
Neuhaus imposed religious morality upon his YPU audience just as he and his
counterparts would impose it upon America. In view of the current political and
intellectual environment, it seems that they are succeeding.
In an unusual situation, the Left was peppered with members of the Yale
College Humanist Society (YCHS). Neuhaus and Carter were unable to convince the
Yale Humanists of the virtues of religious morality, particularly because these
virtues were assumed rather than debated. Most members of the YCHS were
outraged at being called religious and sinners, and departed with an even
stronger conviction that their group and beliefs are necessary.
The recently-founded YCHS is the only undergraduate organization on campus for
those calling themselves atheists, agnostics, humanists and/or free-thinkers.
Its leader, Daniel Farkas, MC '00, said, "Historically, discussing atheism and
agnosticism has been taboo, but we are interested in breaking stereotypes and
showing that people don't need either God or religion in order to find meaning
and answers in their lives. Atheism, agnosticism, and humanism are perfectly
viable alternatives to traditional religion. The YCHS is here to show people
why and how." And, of course, to oppose the religious right whenever
possible.
Nationally, humanists on college campuses are hardly unique. "Groups exist on
many other campuses," Farkas said. "Now it's Yale's turn." The YCHS belongs to
the Campus Freethought Alliance (CFA), an activist group which currently unites
more than 80 college and university humanistic groups worldwide.
The CFA Declaration of Necessity states: "We have witnessed a resurgence of
religious fundamentalism, hand-in-hand with a growing belief in mysticism, the
paranormal, and the occult. We have witnessed a growing disdain for science and
a flight from reason and the principles of the Enlightenment, both in popular
media and in the halls of academe. We have witnessed a deplorable onslaught by
religious factions upon personal liberties. Organized student opposition is
necessary as never before. Though the tide of unreason is rising, we have taken
it upon ourselves to stand in union against it."
Neuhaus's remarks certainly show that dangerous, bigoted irrationalism can
invade the Yale campus. But dogmatic religion is not the sole perpetrator of
"unreason": academic postmodernism also brings down our university. The
traditional proponents of reason seem to have joined the forces of unreason in
attacking rationality at the college level, and groups like the YCHS provide
crucial student opposition to these trends.
The Yale Humanists serve another key purpose as well. Most college campuses
have Newman Centers, Hillel, and a Campus Crusade for Christ. But where can
atheist and agnostic students go to consort with individuals sympathetic to
their beliefs? Beyond defending free intellectual inquiry, humanistic groups
offer non-believers a sympathetic community. Indeed, surely non-theists need
support more than theists: after all, they are the minority.
We should welcome the YCHS on campus. And if Neuhaus tells you that humanists
eat babies or perform bloody sacrifices, ignore him. After all, everyone's
favorite Yalie, George Bush, DC '48, once said, "I don't know that atheists
should be considered as [U.S.] citizens."
Humanists are feared and slandered on a far too routine basis for the simple
reason that they defend a core of beliefs that some find terrifying, because
they willingly criticize religion and postmodernism. This quality should not
be condemned.
Chris Mooney is a junior in Silliman.
Back to Opinion...
|