|
|
A tale of two special teams for the Bulldogs
By Matthew Goldenberg
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. It was two successful
fake punts; it was two fumbled punt returns. It was a well-orchestrated,
89-yard drive in the two-minute drill; it was five yards too short. It was a
total-yardage battle: Yale 419, Dartmouth 164; it was a final score: Dartmouth
22, Yale 19.
 |
| JULIA TIERNAN/YH |
| Kick returns have been a weakness for Yale. |
|
For the Bulldogs, the Sat., Oct. 17 loss at Dartmouth was simultaneously
thrilling and tragic. "I thought we played the best game on both sides of the
ball that we've played all season," head coach Jack Siedlecki said. "We
completely outplayed them, but we lost. That's a tough thing to swallow." The
defeat was especially wrenching in that, unlike in previous losses to
Connecticut and Colgate, Yale's defense was not dominated by a powerful
quarterback, nor was the Eli offense stifled. Instead, the Bulldogs lost the
game on special teams.
Play by Yale's special teams was, like its overall performance, "as
contrasting as could be," Siedlecki said. "We had some good plays, but we made
four huge mistakes." Those four errors ultimately cost the Bulldogs the game.
All of Dartmouth's 22 points came, directly or indirectly, from the special
teams blunders.
Yale dominated the game in the first half, making three deep drives into
Dartmouth territory, each of which resulted in a Mike Murawczyk, MC '01, field
goal. Poor kickoff coverage, however, allowed the Big Green to gain field
position in Yale territory, leading to a halftime score of 9-9. "There's no way
it should have been a 9-9 game at the half," Siedlecki said. "We're not kicking
the ball deep enough. We've got to get the ball deeper to get good coverage."
But while the special teams' performance in the first half was bad, things
would only get much worse. On two consecutive Dartmouth punts in the third
quarter, returner Todd Tomich TC '01, last year's Ivy League Rookie of the
Year, fumbled the ball, leading to two Dartmouth touchdowns. Yet, despite these
errors, Siedlecki plans to stick with his return man. "We have tremendous
confidence in Todd," Siedlecki said. "He's one of the best players we have. The
first fumble wasn't his fault. One of our guys hit Todd as he caught the ball.
The second one was just not a smart play."
For all that went wrong for special teams on Saturday, one thing went right:
Murawczyk. His four field goals set a school record, and he currently leads
Division I-AA in field goals per game (1.8). Against Dartmouth, he even got to
try his hand at quarterback, successfully completing two passes on fake punts
in the fourth quarter. "We're asking him to do a lot," Siedlecki said. "He's
done a great job on the fakes. He's a sophomore who's still developing, but
he's been real good."
For Murawczyk, handling kicking and punting responsibilities this season has
been a welcome change from last year. "Placekicking is a real job now. Last
year, it was just an every now and then type of thing." And, while his punting
has suffered somewhat because he has had to split time between his two roles,
it is his placekicking in which he takes the most pride. "I fell much more
comfortable in my role now," Murawczyk said. "The combination of [snapper
Steve] Petrie, [holder] Kenny [Marschner] and me is one of the best in the
nation."
While Murawczyk's place-kicking has been impressive, his many field goals are
symptoms of Yale's recent bout of red-zone anemia. Against Holy Cross and
Dartmouth, Yale drove the ball inside the 20-yard line nine times but scored
only one touchdown. "If we were in the NFL, everybody would be happy,"
Siedlecki said. "They love field goals."
But this weekend's visitors from New York are neither Giants nor Jets, but
they are Lions. And if Yale is to win its Sat., Oct. 24 game against Columbia,
Muraw-czyk will have to start kicking fewer field goals and more extra points.
However, touchdowns may be hard to come by against a tough Columbia defense
that is second in the league in scoring defense (16.8 points per game).
"They're a very good defensive team," Siedlecki said. "It's going to be a real
physical game."
With a win over the Lions (2-3, 1-1 Ivy), Yale can keep its Ivy championship
hopes alive. "I feel good about our chances," Siedlecki said. "We've got the
two undefeated teams [Pennsylvania and Princeton] ahead on our schedule, so we
control our own destiny. We're good enough to compete for the title. We just
have to find a way to win."
Ah, yes. Winning is a far, far better thing.
Back to Sports...
|