|
|
University takes four spot in new science rankings
By Kris Siriratsivawong
 |
| JULIA TIERNAN/YH |
| UPHILL BATTLE: Yale's science departments ranked fourth in science research nationally. |
|
Yale must once again share the spotlight in published rankings. According to
Science Watch, which is affiliated with the Institute for Scientific
Information (ISI), Yale ranks behind Harvard, Stanford, and Caltech in science
research.
The September/October 1998 issue of Science Watch listed the top
federally funded American universities in 21 areas of science, based on
the impact of published studies.
Both Yale College Dean Richard Brodhead, BR '68, GRD '72, and University
President Richard Levin, GRD '74, were pleased with the rankings. Brodhead
especially approved of how the rankings stressed impact of departments versus
their sizes. "Many of our departments are smaller than comparable departments
at schools where that department is one of the main activities," Brodhead said.
"What this study suggests is that when the size factor is eliminated, the
excellence of Yale's research operations becomes much more evident."
President Levin, GRD '74, agreed. "We did fairly well. Science at Yale is
stronger than many people think." Levin, however, admitted, "We ranked in the
top 10 in nine of the 21 fields. Of course, that means we didn't rank in the
top 10 in twelve fields. It's very clear to us that in a number of scientific
areas we need to make improvements."
Yale science professors and researchers were wary of citation-based rankings.
While Mark D. Biggins, associate molecular biophysics and biochemistry
professor, believed that the rankings gave a "reasonable feel" of where
universities stand in research, he also downplayed their value. "One of my most
cited papers was a rinky-dink technique I developed as a grad student, which is
far from the most profound and interesting of my research," he said.
Alan Fanning, associate research scientist in the Department of Internal
Medicine and Digestive Diseases, cautioned that certain factors may throw the
average of citations per paper off balance and result in misrepresented data.
"You can have a single paper, considered a fluke, that is cited by virtually
everybody, which would contribute to an undeservedly high average
citation-per-paper value," he explained.
When selecting candidates for professors, Yale science departments place
emphasis on research in addition to teaching. Donald Crothers, chair of the
chemistry department, explained that those candidates who are chosen as junior
faculty must have "excelled in a particular field of research and have
published extensively, authoring about eight to 20 papers in their careers."
Back to News...
|