The faces caught in the crossfire
By Christopher Burke
When their contract expired 26 months ago, Yale's police officers could
never have imagined it would come to this.
But this afternoon, with negotiations at a standstill and frustration on both
sides continuing to mount, the Yale Police Benevolent Association (YPBA) turns
to Mayor John DeStefano, Jr. to discuss its latest proposal for a contract
settlement. A meeting between the mayor and University negotiators will most
likely follow.
This is not the first time that the police union has made a call to City
Hall--a similar attempt was made a few weeks prior to Commencement in May.
DeStefano reviewed the union's proposals and agreed to help mediate the
dispute. Yale and the YPBA met twice this summer with DeStefano acting as
mediator. But even DeStefano--a key player in the 1996 settlement between the
University and Locals 34 and 35--can't get either side to budge.
Now that school is back in session, both sides seem more willing to resume
bargaining. Yet despite agreements on dozens of issues, two still stand in the
way of an agreement: the conditions of officer pensions and qualifications
needed to obtain disability benefits.
While University officials insist that they have made significant strides on
pensions, including the option for officers to begin collecting at age 50, the
YPBA counters that the conditions of the proposed pension plan are so
unattractive that no officer would take advantage of the opportunity to retire
at the earlier age.
A similar rift exists on the collection of disabil-
ity benefits. The University will offer long-term disability (LTD) only when
policemen are acting as official representatives of the law on or off-duty. The
union wants these benefits extended to all off-duty injuries, regardless of
whether or not officers were acting in an official capacity when injured.
The officers' insistence on these issues makes the possibility of a quick
settlement highly unlikely. "These issues are just so vital," YPBA Spokesman
Officer Chris Morganti said. "Pension and LTD are always the most important."
The stalemate has caused the YPBA to explore other ways to get their message
across. Last year saw a Bulldog Days protest and one-day work slowdown.
According to Morganti, more demonstrations could soon follow. If negotiations
continue to go nowhere, prominent University dates such as Parents' Weekend are
likely targets for protests.
And with both sides drawing their lines in the sand, job actions could soon
become more serious. "We always have the option to call for a strike vote,"
Morganti said. "And I'm personally confident that we have enough support to
call for such a vote." Once a vote is called for, officers then make the final
decision whether to take action.
The University is taking the possibility of a strike very seriously. "We are
prepared to keep the campus secure--that's the reality of the situation," Brian
Tunney, Yale's director of labor relations, said. "We have to be ready." Tunney
stated that in the event of strike, supervisors would assume some of the
duties of the union officers, and New Haven police would be called on for
help.
But for now, talk of a strike is just that--talk. There's plenty of it after
two years with no settlement. And while not everyone affected by the 26-month
standoff has a seat at the bargaining table, countless surrounding players have
opinions, stories, and ideas about the most recent of Yale's labor woes. Their
stories follow.
The chief
While the police union and University negotiators have made their positions in
the contract dispute clear, not everyone wearing a Yale police uniform is part
of the YPBA. Those in supervisory positions are not part of the union, and
thus have different terms under which they work for the University.
It would seem that such a working arrangement might cause tension between
supervisors and union members. On the one hand, all officers must work together
to ensure safety on the Yale campus; on the other hand, a bitter contract
dispute cannot be easily forgotten, especially when your supervisor is not your
equal at the negotiating table.
The man who knows this better than anyone is Acting Police Chief James
Perrotti. A 25-year veteran of the Yale police force, Perrotti has looked
sympathetically upon his officers' suffering throughout the dispute. But at the
same time, he remembers his own days as a Yale cop--when working conditions
were vastly different than those of the present.
"When I was a patrol officer, there was no bargaining unit, so we took what
the University gave us," Perrotti said. "I pretty much accepted what the
University was giving at the time, and hoped that improvements would be made.
And that has happened."
The son of a farmer, Perrotti worked manual labor jobs before joining the Yale
police force and never received the kinds of benefits he currently sees as
chief. But while Perrotti recognizes the severity of his officers' contract
woes, he would not condone his cops walking off the job. "I think some of them
feel [a strike is possible], but I would not have gone on strike as an
officer," he said. "People expect their cops to come to work. I took an oath
when I took this job, and I would not turn my back on it."
The negotiator
Brian Tunney, Yale's director of labor relations, knows about trial by fire.
When he took charge of the University's labor negotiations in 1995, he found
himself right in the middle of the Local 34/35 contract battle.
"Professionally, it was the best time of my life," he said. "I knew what I was
coming into."
Tunney brings to the table a lifetime of negotiating experience. Prior to
Yale, Tunney worked for seven years as director of labor relations at Columbia
and also spent five years in the New York City Transit Authority.
And Tunney likes his seemingly difficult job--one that requires balancing
personal conviction with job responisibility. "Simply, I enjoy this work. At
its most simple form, it is people resolving problems," he explained. "Of
course you get frustrated, but you have to believe in the process."
More importantly, you have to believe in the client you're representing at the
bargaining table--and Tunney believes in Yale. "This place is willing to do the
right thing, and I have been comfortable with the decisions that they make," he
said. "No one comes and tells me what to do. We work collaboratively, and
everyone I work with on the University end is very solid."
As for the police dispute, Tunney voiced frustration about working with a
"tighter, more discreet" group than Local 34/35. Yet he refuses to let these
frustrations affect his resolve to hold the line. "The YPBA has been
frustrating, but it takes what it takes," he said. "Neither side, in any
negotiation, wants to rush and make a deal by giving away things that are
unreasonable. It's never the right position to just say, `Dammit, let's just
get this thing over with.'"
The labor leader
Another seasoned veteran of Yale's labor struggles is Local 35 President Bob
Proto. Proto was on the frontlines of Yale's bitter 1996 contract dispute, and
he sees similar patterns in Yale's negotiating tactics. In that dispute, the
University was fully prepared for the Local 34/35 walkout, countering with a
reshuffled workforce and meal stipends for students. With negotiations stuck in
neutral, Proto speculates that the University is devoting its energy towards
strike preparations--not workable contract proposals.
"I would not be surprised if the University allowed a strike to happen," he
said. "In our case, the University was gearing up for a long strike, and for a
period before the strike, it was not bargaining in good faith. The same
situation could be happening [here]. The fact that the University has let this
go on for two years is a sign that it has no interest in settling. Yale feels
it can win a war of attrition."
Predictably, Proto is harshly critical of the University's treatment of its
police. "If I had a child at Yale, I would be appalled by the University
keeping an eye on the bottom line rather than campus safety," he said.
The PR man
It's Tom Conroy's job to counter comments such as Proto's. Yale isn't usually
a tough place to sell. But over the past few years, University troubles in
dealing with its workforce have posed interesting problems to those whose job
it is to protect Yale's image. So how can Yale give its latest labor woes a
positive spin?
"I think that many people start from the point that that labor concerns are
legitimate, and, thus management finds itself as having a less valid position,"
Conroy, the acting director of public affairs, said. "But what people have to
remember...is that the Yale that negotiates with the police is the Yale that
represents the students, staff, faculty, and community--and that the
University's goals...are every bit as legitimate."
According to Conroy, Yale's goal in spreading the word about its stance is
fairly simple: "We want people to say, `Hey, even if [the police] get
two-thirds of their demands, or one-third, they will still have a good job,
with a good place to work, with good benefits.'"
A partner in crime
Officer Frank Lombardi, vice president of New Haven Police Union Local 530,
knows what Yale cops are going through. His union is currently negotiating for
its own contract, which expired on June 30. Further, he knows some of the Yale
police officers personally and sympathizes with their plight.
"I'm friends with some of the guys," he said. "Some of us even came on
together and went to the same police academy. I think that some of them feel
that things are going slowly, that they are dealing with a very rich
University. You'd think that such a place would want to take care of the people
who provide security."
But even though Lombardi supports the YPBA, he is apprehensive about the YPBA
walking off the job. By state law, the New Haven Police Union cannot strike.
And even though the YBPA can legally strike, Lombardi doesn't see the benefit
of such an option--even if it pushes the envelope with negotiations.
"Frankly, a strike might be a little extreme, especially in a line of work
such as security. It's not that great of a tool--it's almost
counterproductive," he explained. "There's a public safety issue here. If they
went on strike, there are certain people who might take advantage of that
situation. How do you justify putting the public at risk?"
The cop
And then there are the officers. It is their contract, their security,
and their future. Quite simply, the negotiation process has taken its toll.
"It's been difficult for me personally," Morganti said. "I have two younger
kids--my youngest just started school. It's hectic and troublesome to get to
some of these negotiating sessions--having to leave my family, find a
babysitter. I'm lucky to have a wife who's so understanding."
Yet according to Morganti, the University he works for doesn't share the same
understanding as his family. All that remains is tension.
"Personally, at the negotiating table, especially early on, I'd get angry at
Yale because they wouldn't recoginze the job we do," he said. "They would
counter our offers by saying `No one else gets that.' I don't know if their
strategy was to get us angry, but if it was, it worked."
So maybe after 26 months of negotiations, Yale's officers could have
imagined this.
Back to News...
|