|
|
BAC brings home the Bacon in new exhibit
By Karen Rosenberg
 |
| COURTESY YALE CENTER FOR BRITISH ART |
| Beacon's contorted faces explode with ferocity. |
|
After a year-long hiatus for renovations, the Center for British Art is
back--or has London's Tate Gallery relocated to New Haven? While you might
still recognize Louis Kahn's subtly beautiful structure, the art on display
indicates that the Center has been utterly transformed. Don't worry, those
stodgy old gents in wigs and those generic landscapes haven't gone
anywhere--you'll still find many of them on the fourth floor, along with the
tried-and-true Turner and Constable. The remaining three-fourths of the
exhibition space, however, cocks a snook at any stereotype of British
propriety.
On Fri., Jan. 22, the Center will reopen with a triad of shows, exhibiting the
work of some of the major figurative artists of the last half-century: Francis
Bacon, Lucian Freud, and Henry Moore. For these three, the figure, notably
absent in much of 20th-century art, never disappeared. Rather, the human body
achieved a new status as a vehicle for the anxieties of postwar British
society. In featuring the work of these artists, the Center for British Art
makes a bold and compelling statement--one that not only emphasizes modern
British contributions to the art world, but also asserts the figure's staying
power in a modern context.
The Francis Bacon retrospective, covering almost two floors, is unquestionably
the highlight of the Center's new offerings. Dynamic, bizarre, and often
downright gory, Bacon's distortions of the figure take enormous liberties with
representation, while still maintaining a human presence. His raw, angst-laden
treatment of the body is rooted in Surrealism's Freudian neuroses and
"exquisite corpses," but has less obvious, more established precedents, such as
Medieval altarpieces and Classical myths.
The show, arranged more or less chronologically, reveals the relative
consistency of Bacon's focus even as his work becomes more ambitious. The
earlier works, from the '40s and '50s, introduce bodies and faces without
specific identities, their blurred features and composite jumbles of limbs
barely recognizable as flesh and blood. Snarling mouths and clawlike
protrusions evoke war's animal ferocity, playing off the equally grotesque
humanity in Bacon's "Study of a Baboon." When Bacon turns to portraiture in the
'60s, the physiological torment only intensifies. Not even the Pope escapes
Bacon's contortions of surface. In a series inspired by Velasquez's "Portrait
of Pope Innocent X," his face looks like it's been through a meat grinder.
Bacon's smaller triptych portraits are similarly unsettling, chopping up the
face from three different angles. In these works, the triptych format serves as
a study in movement that effectively multiplies Bacon's observation of
character. His sweeps of the brush expose the primal underpinning beneath the
mask of individual features. One wonders how his models, often friends or
colleagues, felt confronting their own ravaged faces.
Bacon appears to have made certain concessions to art-world trends, although
these remain literally and figuratively in the background: his larger triptychs
of the late '60s and '70s place figures against saturated color fields that
recall Barnett Newman, while many also draw from the artificial palette of Pop
Art. Among these, the glowing orange triptych, "Studies from the Human Body,"
dominates the earlier part of the show.
This piece anticipates the second floor of the exhibit, which is composed
almost exclusively of large, roughly life-size triptychs. More ambitious and
involved than his earlier pieces, these are generally his most striking works.
In them, Bacon finds new ways to rob the human figure of any composure: a torso
cleverly quoted from Ingres, who painted bodies wholly free of anxiety,
receives ironic amputation at the hands of Bacon. Mythical Furies descend in a
reinterpretation of Aeschylus' Orestes. Several pictures "X-ray" the
wounded body by inscribing areas in black circles, while others use red arrows
to pinpoint pain. Triptychs portraying grotesque suffering are not new,
exemplified by Grunewald's Isenheim altarpiece; but here, the redemptive
pretense has been stripped away, and we are left with a nightmare comparable to
Hieronymus Bosch's vision of hell. Bacon is at his best in his larger
triptychs. Perhaps his seething masses of ectoplasm attain their maximum impact
on a life-size scale, inviting empathy and fascination as well as repulsion.
Sharing the second floor with the later Bacon works is a small collection of
Lucian Freud's etchings. Freud is well known for his deliberately
anti-theatrical, disconcerting depictions of the nude figure in paint. Here,
however, the etching medium seems at odds with the tactile nature of Freud's
subjects, models whose masses of flesh beg to be rendered with more sensual
materials.
Covering the ground floor of the Center, Henry Moore's sculptures provide
relief from the distorted, anxiety-laden body. Moore's curvilinear forms soothe
the postwar psyche with motifs such as the family and the reclining woman.
Using the vocabulary of stylized, organic shapes typical of African and
pre-Colombian art and often working in natural materials, Moore turns to the
figure as a timeless source of comfort. Along with Bacon and Freud, Moore's
work constitutes an important response to the question of the figure's fate in
recent art.
Back to A&E...
|