THIS WEEK
Cover News
Opinion A & E
Sports Intramurals
Calendar Comics
 
YH FEATURES
Exclusive
Archives/Search
Planet of Sound
Speak Your Mind
Pick the Pros
Crossword
 
ONLINE TOOLS
Ground Zero
Sublet Search
Rideboard
Book Shopper
Blue Book Search
 
ABOUT US
the Yale Herald
YH Online
 


Pedro MVP debate rages on



Without Pedro, the BoSox would be boohooing at home.

By Chris Pierce

Boston Red Sox pitcher Pedro Martinez should be the American League MVP. Yet despite his having carried his team into the playoffs and blown away the competition for the American League (AL) ERA crown, some critics maintain that Pedro doesn't deserve to be MVP, probably because of the historical prejudice against pitchers winning the award. Sure, pitchers are traditionally snubbed, but rarely does a pitcher have a year like Martinez's 1999—Roger Clemens, the 1986 AL MVP, posted a nearly identical record to Martinez, but his ERA was half a run higher.

When baseball writers cast their votes for MVP, their selection should be the player whose team would suffer the most if he were taken off their roster.
COURTESY CBS.SPORTSLINE.COM
Pedro Martinez is the heart and soul of the Boston Red Sox, but is he the AL MVP?

Using this standard, let's look at some of the other leading MVP candidates. Consider Ivan Rodriguez. Clearly, his defensive skills are excellent, but has anyone ever used a glove to win the MVP? Give Rodriguez a Gold Glove, not an MVP. If his bat were removed from the Rangers lineup, hitters like Rafael Palmiero, Juan Gonzalez, Todd Zeile, Rusty Greer, and Lee Stevens would still prevent Texas from ending up in pitcher's duels. Similarly, although Manny Ramirez put up huge numbers this year, it's safe to say that the White Sox or Tigers wouldn't have taken the AL Central Division title from the Indians if Ramirez had broken his leg in the off-season. Some people argue that Derek Jeter deserves the MVP. But even though the Yankees aren't as good as they were last year, without their shortstop they would still have made the playoffs.

On the other hand, without Pedro, the Sox would be playing golf in October. A look at Boston's playoff rotation shows just how important Pedro Martinez has been. Their other starters were all either hurt for a good portion of the year or were practically given away by the St. Louis Cardinals. With the exception of superstar Nomar Garciaparra, the Red Sox lineup is, in the words of Boston reliever Rod Beck, a collection of "grinders and .270 hitters."

The MVP should be someone who leads his team in the stretch run. In Pedro's final seven regular season starts, he went 6-0 with an 0.82 ERA and 96 strikeouts in 55 innings. His injury in Game One of the AL Division Series stripped the Sox of their only weapon, leaving them defenseless against the Cleveland Indians' offensive abuse. Boston eventually lost the game, and without Martinez, they figure to lose more than that.


Pitchers have the Cy Young, leave the MVP for Pudge

By Chad Golder

Some nights, Pedro Martinez gives me nightmares. As a Yankees fan, I am forced to acknowledge that Pedro is the only player who can single-handedly halt the Bronx BombersÕ march towards a dynasty. He is dominating, and his statistics prove it. That said, he simply does not deserve to be the American League (AL) MVP. PedroÑwhile he is the most valuable pitcher in the leagueÑis still a pitcher, and a pitcher should not win the MVP when there are deserving position-playing candidates.

The guidelines for selecting the MVP are very vague. Nowhere does it say that the MVP should be the player whose team would suffer the most if he were taken off its roster. Moreover, the guidelines never mention Òthe stretch run.Ó The most specific instructions offered to the members of the Baseball WritersÕ Association of America who select the winner are, ÒThe MVP need not come from a division winner or other playoff qualifier.Ó So, with no strict rules to follow, the only thing that I can look to when making my MVP decision is precedent. Since World War II, only seven starting pitchers have won the MVP. The award wasnÕt designed for pitchers. Pitchers have their own award: the Cy Young. You could argue that hitters now have the Hank Aaron Award to recognize their achievements, but that award simply does not carry the honor of the MVP.

Except a few rare cases, baseball abides by the tacit rule that pitchers are honored with the Cy Young and position players are honored with the MVP. I question whether a pitcher can really be the most valuable player when he only plays one-fifth of his teamÕs games (and in PedroÕs case, less because of injury). I would agree with Bret Saberhagen, MartinezÕ own teammate, who contends that pitchers shouldnÕt win the award because position players have a much stronger game-to-game impact on their teamÕs success. One simple fact cannot be ignored: in four out of every five games, Mr. Martinez was sitting on the bench, not playing a role in the SoxÕ success or failure.

With all due respect to Pedro Martinez, he simply doesnÕt deserve the award. Instead, Ivan ÒPudgeÓ Rodriguez should be crowned AL MVP. He has put up amazing offensive numbers coupled with his usual defensive dominance. But most importantly, Pudge plays a position every single day of the season. The MVP belongs to him, just as the Cy Young belongs to Pedro. Back to Sports...

 

 


All materials © 1999 The Yale Herald, Inc., and its staff.
Got any questions, comments, or advice? Email the online editors at
online@yaleherald.com.
Like to join us?